Wednesday, April 8, 2009

Newsroom managers are meeting with staff today

If anyone wants to share a report on what they were told, the comments here are on.

22 comments:

  1. Prediction:
    Manager: Well,what's past is past. We've got to look to the future and protect the paper's reputation while vigorously pursuing our mission.
    You wouldn't be here if we didn't think you are important to the company.
    We're going to have to pull together. We must be unified in our efforts. We'll have to be more efficient than ever before.
    And we have to have faith that we'll be the team that, years from now, is regarded as the devoted team of journalists that saved The Dallas Morning News.
    From now on you'll need to bring your own towels, pencils, water, bath tissue and, because each desk is being fitted with a meter, you'll need to be able to pay for your own electricity which we are precuring at a generous rate only slightly higher per kilowatt hour than your home rate. You can pay your electricity deposit after the meeting.
    Thank you all for coming and, please, remember to pay the $1 attend-a-meeting fee at the door.

    ReplyDelete
  2. You forgot the part about dusting and vacuuming your own area since the cleaning crew was pink slipped.

    ReplyDelete
  3. What EVERY meeting has been about for the past few years:
    *'We here at the top care so much about you, the product and Dallas'
    *'We don't know what the future has in store'
    'Do more with less'

    ReplyDelete
  4. Oh, and carry 13 buckets...

    ReplyDelete
  5. Eight metro editors will become reporters.
    They can't yet name the 14 cities that metro will focus on but it isn't too hard to figure out.
    Metro management will be condenced from 4 levels to two.
    Allen and Edgar will each head two teams. Allen's team will be community focused and Edgar's team will be investigative.
    Both will have GA clusters. Allen will have education and I'm not sure what else. Edgar will have gov't, cops, courts, and I don't know what else.
    Sounds like there won't be an AME and the people who are now deputies to the department heads are most likely to be reporters.

    Did I get that right?

    Bob said that ethical and moral considerations were given when deciding who to lay off. Along with the obvious legal.

    Mark Edgar said that instead of ranking all the reporters and then all the editors, all were ranked and the lowest ranked were laid off.

    ReplyDelete
  6. We want you to make bricks without straw! Because we we want you to use the straw and spin it into gold! -Yours cordially, Ramses Rumplestilstskin

    ReplyDelete
  7. Isn't this like the section journalism we abandoned years ago?

    ReplyDelete
  8. @ 2:44 PM:

    "Mark Edgar said that instead of ranking all the reporters and then all the editors, all were ranked and the lowest ranked were laid off."

    Ranked like how? Page views on stories, experience, yes-man attitudes?

    ReplyDelete
  9. @ Anon 5:53 ... he didn't say

    ReplyDelete
  10. Raise your hand if you think he doesn't know what he's doing.

    ReplyDelete
  11. This is laughable.

    They fire the people who pound the pavement every day in search for stories, who cultivated sources for years, who wrote prize-winning stories, and in their place they place people who haven't done that for years and probably don't want to do it, either.

    I'm sorry, anyone think this makes sense?

    At least four of the Metro reporters are Spanish speakers, and prolly were the only ones in that newsroom. How's the paper going to cover the increasingly growing Spanish-speaking community in this town?

    That they fired those reporters is yet another sign that the Morning News has no interest in covering immigration, one of the most pressing issues affecting not just Dallas but the country. It's obvious management has little idea of what are the pressing issues that affect their readers.


    Give it up for "live better here."

    ReplyDelete
  12. This is pretty much rearranging deck chairs on the Titanic. Given a dozen more reporters D Magazine could do as well - and just may try. We hear a lot about online initiative but never see any. The community remains alienated.

    By the way is it possible to produce an Editorial Page (with 0 ads) with maybe one or two fewer editorial writers? Does the EP get enough readership to justify the amount of money spent on it? I am not saying get rid of it but really there are a lot of high paid people there just spouting off.

    And really, do our columnist get read? And are there really 14 cities that are that important for us to cover?

    Management lost at sea.

    ReplyDelete
  13. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  14. As a former DMNer who departed voluntarily in the '06 RIF buyout, I read all of this with a heavy heart. I wish everyone affected the best. (Jobs are sown thin here in Alaska, too.)
    -Mike Peters

    ReplyDelete
  15. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  16. As one of the departed Metro reporters, I call BULLSHIT on the ranking nonsense. Look at the list of people axed yesterday. They were productive, innovative and well-respected.

    To say they were the bottom of the heap is simply a joke. Especially since Edgar never spoke one word to me. My guess is many of these names were selected to keep the severance payout low -- low salary plus short tenure equals tiny check.

    Looks like I'll transition quickly from feeling sad about leaving to feeling lucky to be free. How disheartening.

    ReplyDelete
  17. "My guess is many of these names were selected to keep the severance payout low -- low salary plus short tenure equals tiny check."

    You know, I wondered. Thank you. Cause that one statement cleared up a lot for me and made me feel better than just about anything else that was said.

    Cause, um, saying, basically, that it was more "moral and ethical" to lay me off sho nuff doesn't make me feel real good. (And, before someone yells at me -- I know it wasn't the commenter saying that. I read it.)

    ReplyDelete
  18. Let's also remember we were told job cut decisions were collaborative.
    But we lost some terrific people, whose prose and spirit will be missed.

    ReplyDelete
  19. The sad irony here is that being laid off is highly personal. But it has nothing to do with your personal skills, assets, integrity ... it's all money and politics.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Moral and ethical.. my ass.

    ReplyDelete